Sociology of Differences and Inequalities (5 cr)

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

After completion of the course the student is able to
- specify different sociological debates about differences and inequalities
- explore sociologically how differences such as gender, ethnicity, competence and class are structured, how they are reproduced and what kind of effects they have for individuals and groups
- use theoretical approaches in analyzing societal differences and inequalities.

Execution methods

Teaching profile: ONLINE 2.

Accomplishment methods

The course is completed by reading the literature and taking a book exam (on EXAM).

Content

The objective of the course is to explore social structures from the perspective of intersecting differences and inequalities. The basic premise on the course is that differences between individuals and groups are not neutral facts but outcomes of cultural processes that are entwined with questions of power and governance. During the course the student will become acquainted with sociological debates about differences, power relations and justice.

Location and time

The book exam can be completed during any of the teaching periods in EXAM.

Materials

Choose a or b. a) Göran Therborn (2013) The Killing Fields of Inequality AND Beverly Skeggs (2004) Class, self, culture. b) Sara Ahmed (2014) The Cultural Politics of Emotion AND Stuart Hall (2021) Selected Writings on Race and Difference.

Teaching methods

The course is completed independently by reading the literature and taking a book exam in the electronic exam service Exam.

Completion alternatives

Oppimistehtävä: Kotitentti, joka suoritetaan opettajan erikseen antamien ohjeiden mukaisesti. Kotitentistä sovitaan etukäteen vastuuopettajan kanssa: veera.kinnunen@ulapland.fi.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Fail (0): Performance is highly deficient or erroneous. The work may be based on serious misunderstandings.

Sufficient (1): Performance is lacking in scope, superficial, or corresponds poorly to the assignment. The author merely lists things out of context.

Satisfactory (2): The performance mainly repeats the content of the course or addresses them one-sidedly. The work may contain errors or obscurities.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Good (3): Performance corresponds to the assignment, manifesting skills to analyse and justify the content of the course. The work may contain some deficiencies.

Very good (4): The author has addressed the issue comprehensively. Performance manifest comprehension and skills to critically analyse and argue the content of the course.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent (5): Performance delineates an extensive whole and the author can apply knowledge in a multifaceted way or place it in various contexts. The work manifests independency and insight, and it is a flawless entity that involves justified thinking or critical contemplation. The work is well written and implemented.