Study Guide

Objective

In the project you will continue the Fall semester's case. You work independently as a member of a project team ja bear responsibility from your own work. Project follows the CDIO-model: I (Implementation) = you implement the designed solution and produce necessary documentation. O (operate) = You monitor the functionality of the solution and make improvements if necessary.

Content

..

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Process evaluation: participation and interaction, participation to work, group work skills, problem solving skills.
Output evaluation: The quality of the work results, quality of the documentation, comparison of results to the task description

Grade 1.
The student participates almost to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks. The student requires a lot of support from the teacher and team in fulfilling the tasks and cannot perform them independently in given timeframe. The results and quality of the results fulfill only the minimum requirements. There is clear errors and formal lacks in the results. The student describes issues on inadequate grounds and there is great lacks in the knowhow. There is great lacks in making and following the project plan.

Grade 2.
The student participates almost to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull partially independent as a part of the team but the student still needs a lot of help from the teacher and team. The results and quality of the results fulfill the minimum requirements. There is some recurrent errors and formal lacks in the results. The student aims to describe issues professionally. Following the project plan is still partially unplanned and the student needs guidance in fulfilling the work requirements.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Process evaluation: participation and interaction, participation to work, group work skills, problem solving skills.
Output evaluation: The quality of the work results, quality of the documentation, comparison of results to the task description

Grade 3.
The student participates to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks in given timeframe. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull partially independent as a part of the team, the work and results are done mainly with good quality. Results are almost flawless and the documentation fulfills the necessary requirements. Following the project plan is under control, given tasks are performed well and returned mainly in given timeframe.

Grade 4.
The student participates to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks in given timeframe. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull almost totally independent as a part of the team, the work and results are done with good quality. The student clearly handles the topics well and can present issues according to given instructions and rules. The student can plan his/her own work based on the project plan and progress independently. Timetable is under control, tasks are done and returned within given timeframe.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Process evaluation: participation and interaction, participation to work, group work skills, problem solving skills.
Output evaluation: The quality of the work results, quality of the documentation, comparison of results to the task description

Grade 5.
The student participates to every action defined in the project and passes clearly all the required mandatory tasks in given timeframe. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull totally independent as a part of the team. The work and results are done with high quality and the student is able to produce new knowledge and solutions. The results are done with excellent quality. The student handles the issues of the project very well and is able to make conclusions well and adopt them in new context, also with demanding problems. Following the timetable is well under control, tasks are done and returned within given timeframe.

Qualifications

K502K201 Work life project

Objective

In the project you will continue the Fall semester's case. You work independently as a member of a project team ja bear responsibility from your own work. Project follows the CDIO-model: I (Implementation) = you implement the designed solution and produce necessary documentation. O (operate) = You monitor the functionality of the solution and make improvements if necessary.

Content

..

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Process evaluation: participation and interaction, participation to work, group work skills, problem solving skills.
Output evaluation: The quality of the work results, quality of the documentation, comparison of results to the task description

Grade 1.
The student participates almost to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks. The student requires a lot of support from the teacher and team in fulfilling the tasks and cannot perform them independently in given timeframe. The results and quality of the results fulfill only the minimum requirements. There is clear errors and formal lacks in the results. The student describes issues on inadequate grounds and there is great lacks in the knowhow. There is great lacks in making and following the project plan.

Grade 2.
The student participates almost to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull partially independent as a part of the team but the student still needs a lot of help from the teacher and team. The results and quality of the results fulfill the minimum requirements. There is some recurrent errors and formal lacks in the results. The student aims to describe issues professionally. Following the project plan is still partially unplanned and the student needs guidance in fulfilling the work requirements.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Process evaluation: participation and interaction, participation to work, group work skills, problem solving skills.
Output evaluation: The quality of the work results, quality of the documentation, comparison of results to the task description

Grade 3.
The student participates to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks in given timeframe. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull partially independent as a part of the team, the work and results are done mainly with good quality. Results are almost flawless and the documentation fulfills the necessary requirements. Following the project plan is under control, given tasks are performed well and returned mainly in given timeframe.

Grade 4.
The student participates to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks in given timeframe. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull almost totally independent as a part of the team, the work and results are done with good quality. The student clearly handles the topics well and can present issues according to given instructions and rules. The student can plan his/her own work based on the project plan and progress independently. Timetable is under control, tasks are done and returned within given timeframe.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Process evaluation: participation and interaction, participation to work, group work skills, problem solving skills.
Output evaluation: The quality of the work results, quality of the documentation, comparison of results to the task description

Grade 5.
The student participates to every action defined in the project and passes clearly all the required mandatory tasks in given timeframe. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull totally independent as a part of the team. The work and results are done with high quality and the student is able to produce new knowledge and solutions. The results are done with excellent quality. The student handles the issues of the project very well and is able to make conclusions well and adopt them in new context, also with demanding problems. Following the timetable is well under control, tasks are done and returned within given timeframe.

Assessment methods and criteria

Process evaluation: Participation to project work, reviews and staying in schedule
Throughput evaluation: Document quality (project documents, drawings, instructions, technical documents etc.) , comparison of results to the task description

Qualifications

K502K201 Work life project

Objective

In the project you will continue the Fall semester's case. You work independently as a member of a project team ja bear responsibility from your own work. Project follows the CDIO-model: I (Implementation) = you implement the designed solution and produce necessary documentation. O (operate) = You monitor the functionality of the solution and make improvements if necessary.

Content

..

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Process evaluation: participation and interaction, participation to work, group work skills, problem solving skills.
Output evaluation: The quality of the work results, quality of the documentation, comparison of results to the task description

Grade 1.
The student participates almost to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks. The student requires a lot of support from the teacher and team in fulfilling the tasks and cannot perform them independently in given timeframe. The results and quality of the results fulfill only the minimum requirements. There is clear errors and formal lacks in the results. The student describes issues on inadequate grounds and there is great lacks in the knowhow. There is great lacks in making and following the project plan.

Grade 2.
The student participates almost to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull partially independent as a part of the team but the student still needs a lot of help from the teacher and team. The results and quality of the results fulfill the minimum requirements. There is some recurrent errors and formal lacks in the results. The student aims to describe issues professionally. Following the project plan is still partially unplanned and the student needs guidance in fulfilling the work requirements.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Process evaluation: participation and interaction, participation to work, group work skills, problem solving skills.
Output evaluation: The quality of the work results, quality of the documentation, comparison of results to the task description

Grade 3.
The student participates to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks in given timeframe. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull partially independent as a part of the team, the work and results are done mainly with good quality. Results are almost flawless and the documentation fulfills the necessary requirements. Following the project plan is under control, given tasks are performed well and returned mainly in given timeframe.

Grade 4.
The student participates to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks in given timeframe. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull almost totally independent as a part of the team, the work and results are done with good quality. The student clearly handles the topics well and can present issues according to given instructions and rules. The student can plan his/her own work based on the project plan and progress independently. Timetable is under control, tasks are done and returned within given timeframe.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Process evaluation: participation and interaction, participation to work, group work skills, problem solving skills.
Output evaluation: The quality of the work results, quality of the documentation, comparison of results to the task description

Grade 5.
The student participates to every action defined in the project and passes clearly all the required mandatory tasks in given timeframe. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull totally independent as a part of the team. The work and results are done with high quality and the student is able to produce new knowledge and solutions. The results are done with excellent quality. The student handles the issues of the project very well and is able to make conclusions well and adopt them in new context, also with demanding problems. Following the timetable is well under control, tasks are done and returned within given timeframe.

Assessment methods and criteria

Process evaluation: Participation to project work, reviews and staying in schedule
Throughput evaluation: Document quality (project documents, drawings, instructions, technical documents etc.) , comparison of results to the task description

Qualifications

K502K201 Work life project