Theories of International Relations (5 op)
Toteutuksen tunnus: SOPT1210V24-3001
Toteutuksen perustiedot
- Ilmoittautumisaika
- 04.12.2024 - 31.07.2025
- Ilmoittautuminen toteutukselle on käynnissä.
- Ajoitus
- 01.01.2025 - 31.07.2025
- Toteutus on käynnissä.
- Opintopistemäärä
- 5 op
- Lähiosuus
- 0 op
- Virtuaaliosuus
- 5 op
- Toteutustapa
- Etäopetus
- Yksikkö
- Yhteiskuntatieteiden tiedekunta
- Opetuskielet
- englanti
- Paikat
- 1 - 500
- Koulutus
- Politiikkatieteiden ja sosiologian tutkinto-ohjelma
- Opettajat
- Ilari Nikula
- Julian Reid
- Vastuuopettaja
- Julian Reid
- Ryhmät
-
SOPTainePolitiikkatieteet ja sosiologia aineopinnot
-
ONLINE-YTKOnline YTK
-
YTKENGSOC/YTK - Courses offered in English
- Opintojakso
- SOPT1210V24
Arviointiasteikko
H-5
Tavoitteet
After completion of the course the student is able to
- discuss the main theories of the discipline of International Relations (IR)
- identify the main myths of each of the different main theories of IR
- explain the ideological limits and potentials of different theories of IR.
Toteutustavat
Teaching profile: ONLINE 1.
Suoritustavat
Participation in all classes including a video presentation (2 op) and a written assignment (3 op).
Sisältö
This course introduces students to the ways that different theories make sense of the nature of international relations. The purpose of the course is to give a thorough overview of these different theories, contextualise them in the historical conditions of their emergence, and explore their ideological limits and political potentials. These theories include: realism; liberalism; constructivism; gender and feminism; Marxism; anarchism; and environmentalism.
Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)
Fail (0): Performance is highly deficient or erroneous. The work is based on serious misunderstandings.
Sufficient (1): Performance is lacking in scope, superficial, or corresponds poorly to the assignment. The author merely lists things out of context or addresses them one-sidedly. The work may contain errors or obscurities.
Satisfactory (2): Poor in significant respects, but involving signs of comprehension and thought.
Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)
Good (3): Good work. Performance corresponds to the assignment, manifesting comprehension and a skill to analyse and justify. The author has addressed the issue comprehensively. The work may contain some deficiencies.
Very good (4): Very good effort. Above the average, demonstrating potential for excellence.
Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)
Excellent (5): Performance delineates an extensive whole and the author can apply knowledge in a multifaceted way or place it in various contexts. The work manifests independence and insight, and it is a flawless entity that involves justified thinking or critical contemplation. The work is well written and implemented.
Esitietovaatimukset
Introduction to Political Studies and Sociology