Seeing is believing – testing procedures for fast implementation of research results into working life (4 op)

Arviointiasteikko

H-5

Toteutustavat

•Students familiarize themselves with written report “Best practices for transferring knowledge to working life” and write a reflection based on it (share their own development ideas)
•Students participate the online event/webinar "Visualize to apply" arranged by Estoril Higher Institute for Tourism and Hotel Studies in September (date to be announced) and write a memo about the contents
•Students participate the intensive learning, teaching, training activity week in Estoril, Portugal in November and complete the given exercises there (5. – 10.11. + travel dates 4.11. ja 11.11.)
•Students write a report based on their reflections after the intensive week in Portugal

Suoritustavat

Lähiopetus

Sisältö

Exploring the visual as a way of distributing research results and making research-based knowledge more easily accessible to the tourism sector. The goal is to understand processes in the sector on how the data provided by different methods are distributed and used in the companies. The learning, teaching, training activity "Seeing is believing" will take part in November in Estoril, Portugal. During this event, students will work in international teams and are coached by teachers from all different partners (Slovenia, Norway, Portugal, Finland). The learning process will focus on learning about possibilities of visualization and developing new content and testing this content in practice. The aim of this activity is for the students to gain knowledge of how they can present their results or research with different visualization techniques more effectively. During the intensive study week in Portugal, students will be participating both in classroom activities as well as field trips to tourism businesses.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

Fail (0)
The student does not complete the assignments according to the instructions or does not attend the webinar or the intensive study week at all. He/she does not pass the assignments as required.

Poor (1)
The student has participated the webinar and the intensive study week and has made some basic observations on the topic but reflection is not particularly analytical. The assignments are completed but not always performed according to the instructions and deadlines.

Satisfactory (2)
The student has participated the webinar and the intensive study week and has produced some development ideas and reflections that remain on a basic level. The assignments are completed but not always performed according to the instructions and deadlines.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)

Good (3)
The student has participated the webinar and the intensive study week. His/ her reflection on the topic indicate good familiarization on the study material and contents and he/ she has produced reasonable development ideas. Most of the assignments are performed according to the instructions and deadlines.

Very good (4)
The student has participated the webinar and the intensive study week and shown active participation to the programme. His/ her reflections are analytical and show effort put on the topic. The student’s development ideas are good and well-founded. All the assignments are performed according to the instructions and deadlines.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

Excellent (5)
The student has participated the webinar and the intensive study week and shown remarkably active participation to the programme. His/ her reflections are analytical and show effort put on the topic. The student’s development ideas are creative, viable and well-founded. All the assignments are performed according to the instructions and deadlines.