Designing High-End Customer Experience (5 cr)
Code: R801DL41OJ-3003
General information
Enrollment
11.03.2024 - 10.09.2024
Timing
09.09.2024 - 01.11.2024
Credits
5 op
RD proportion (cr)
1 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
Bachelor of Hospitality Management
Teaching languages
- English
Seats
0 - 50
Degree programmes
- Tourism
Teachers
- Jenny Kilpeläinen
- Petra Paloniemi
Responsible person
Petra Paloniemi
Student groups
-
R81D24SR81D24S Tourism, Rovaniemi, Autumn 2024
Objective
The student gets familiar with different types of tourism products and the basics of customer experiences. In addition, he/she understands the concepts of services and meaningful nature-based luxury experiences and is able to distinguish differences between services and meaningful experiences in tourism. The student is able to design different types of tourism services and meaningful experiences by utilising basic design tools.
Content
• Versatile tourism products and related customer experiences
• Introduction to service and meaningful experience design
• Various models of services and meaningful experiences in tourism
• Meaningful nature-based luxury experiences
• Virtual experiences
• Development of Christmas tourism in Rovaniemi – the Hometown of Santa Claus
• Designing and implementing meaningful experiences (project)
• hospitality and hostmanship
• customers’ cultural background and multicultural communication
• design tools, such as customer persona and customer journey
Location and time
Autumn 2024, Rovaniemi.
Materials
Blomme, R. & Melissen, F. 2014. Hospitality experience: An introduction to hospitality management. Houten, The Netherlands: Noordhoff Uitgevers Groningen.
Pine II, B.J. & Gilmore, J. H. 2013. The experience economy: past, present and future.
To be fully announced in the beginning of the study unit.
Teaching methods
Lectures, group work, study trip, written assignment.
Employer connections
Guest lecturer/s and/or alumni visitor/s.
Exam schedules
To be fully announced in the beginning of the study unit.
International connections
International group of students. Cooperation with other international student groups and alumni network.
Completion alternatives
To be fully announced in the beginning of the study unit.
Content scheduling
• Versatile tourism products and related customer experiences
• Introduction to service and meaningful experience design
• Various models of services and meaningful experiences in tourism
• Meaningful nature-based luxury experiences
• Virtual experiences
• Development of Christmas tourism in Rovaniemi – the Hometown of Santa Claus
• Designing and implementing meaningful experiences (project)
• hospitality and hostmanship
• customers’ cultural background and multicultural communication
• design tools, such as customer persona and customer journey
Evaluation scale
H-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (2)
The student has satisfactory knowledge of different types of tourism products and customer experiences. He/she knows somehow concepts of services and meaningful experiences. The student is able to design meaningful experiences by utilising some basic design tools on a satisfactory level. The assignments are completed but not always performed according to the instructions and deadlines.
Poor (1)
The student has vague knowledge of tourism products and customer experiences. He/she understands somehow concepts of services and meaningful experiences. The student is able to design meaningful experiences by utilising some basic design tools with guidance. The assignments are completed but not always performed according to the instructions and deadlines.
Fail (0)
The student does not complete the assignments according to the instructions or does not attend the learning situations enough or at all. He/she does not pass the assignments, tests and/or the exam as required.
These are the general assessment criteria. Please note that there might be more specific assessment criteria for learning assignments which will be given at the beginning of the study unit.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Very good (4)
The student has very good knowledge of different types of tourism products and customer experiences very well. In addition, he/she understands concepts of services and meaningful experiences well. The student is able to design meaningful experiences by utilising the basic design tools. All the assignments are performed according to the instructions and deadlines.
Good (3)
The student has good knowledge of different types of tourism products and customer experiences. In addition, he/she understands concepts of services and meaningful experiences. The student is able to design meaningful experiences by utilising the basic design tools. Most of the assignments are performed according to the instructions and deadlines.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5)
The student has profound knowledge of different types of tourism products and customer experiences. In addition, he/she understands concepts of services and meaningful experiences very well. The student is able to design meaningful experiences successfully by utilising the basic design tools. All the assignments are performed according to the instructions and deadlines.
Assessment methods and criteria
These are the general assessment criteria. Please note that there might be more specific assessment criteria for learning assignments which will be given at the beginning of the study unit.
Written Assignment 50 %
Experience Project 50 %
Active participation pass/fail
Assessment criteria, fail (0)
Fail (0)
The student does not complete the assignments according to the instructions or does not attend the learning situations enough or at all. He/she does not pass the assignments, tests and/or the exam as required.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Poor (1)
The student has vague knowledge of tourism products and customer experiences. He/she understands somehow concepts of services and meaningful experiences. The student is able to design meaningful experiences by utilising some basic design tools with guidance. The assignments are completed but not always performed according to the instructions and deadlines.
Satisfactory (2)
The student has satisfactory knowledge of different types of tourism products and customer experiences. He/she knows somehow concepts of services and meaningful experiences. The student is able to design meaningful experiences by utilising some basic design tools on a satisfactory level. The assignments are completed but not always performed according to the instructions and deadlines.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4)
Good (3)
The student has good knowledge of different types of tourism products and customer experiences. In addition, he/she understands concepts of services and meaningful experiences. The student is able to design meaningful experiences by utilising the basic design tools. Most of the assignments are performed according to the instructions and deadlines.
Very good (4)
The student has very good knowledge of different types of tourism products and customer experiences very well. In addition, he/she understands concepts of services and meaningful experiences well. The student is able to design meaningful experiences by utilising the basic design tools. All the assignments are performed according to the instructions and deadlines.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5)
The student has profound knowledge of different types of tourism products and customer experiences. In addition, he/she understands concepts of services and meaningful experiences very well. The student is able to design meaningful experiences successfully by utilising the basic design tools. All the assignments are performed according to the instructions and deadlines.