China's Political System and China as a Global Actor in Before and After Corona World

Objective

After the completion of the course, students are able to:

- Comprehend the central and complex role of politics in China

- Understand the paradox of China; why the party is at the same time omnipotent, but in many cases impotent

- Have knowledge of Chinese politics, political system, institutions.

- Understand, analyze and form an understanding of the causes and consequences of China’s rapid globalization.

- Discern political motivations and consequences of China’s globalization and its impact on the Arctic regions.

Content

The course consists of two overlapping sections: an introduction to the political system of China and China as a global actor with a focus on the Arctic regions. Understanding the politics and political system of China is the essential tool to understanding China’s globalization strive and its regional implications in the Artic regions. In introducing the political system of China, the course provides an overview of the political history, structure, central-regional relations, factional politics within the Communist Party and recent political development in China.

This view provides a solid basis for analyzing one of the most significant changes in the world—China’s changing role in the world. During the last decade China has become increasingly active in seeking resources, markets, talents and political influence in all corners of the world including the Arctic region. The course will provide an analytical view of the role of the Party and other institutional actors in this process. During the course, we will study the political motivation of China’s global outreach and how Beijing is consequently reshaping the global order. We will then compare these processes with increasing Chinese activities in the Arctic region and identify various actors and processes how Beijing and Chinese companies are acting in the Artic regions.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Fail: Performance is highly deficient or erroneous. The work may be based on serious misunderstandings.

Sufficient and satisfactory (1-2): Performance is lacking in scope, superficial, or corresponds poorly to the assignment. The student is unable to illustrate that he/she has studied the material or/and merely lists things out of context or addresses them one-sidedly. The work contain errors or obscurities.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Good and very good (3-4): Performance corresponds to the assignment, manifesting comprehension and a skill of the study material. The author addresses mostly correctly to the assignments and, but the work/tasks may contain some deficiencies.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent (5): Performance is excellent and the students illustrates deep knowledge of the study material / topic. The answers/analysis of the assignments are mostly or completely flawless and/or illustrates justified thinking or critical contemplation. The work is well written and implemented.