Skip to main content

Sociology of Work (5 cr)

Code: SOPT1213B-3003

General information


Enrollment
08.08.2023 - 31.08.2024
Registration for the implementation has ended.
Timing
01.08.2023 - 31.08.2024
Implementation has ended.
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 cr
Local portion
0 cr
Virtual portion
5 cr
Mode of delivery
Distance learning
Unit
Faculty of Social Sciences
Teaching languages
English
Finnish
Seats
1 - 500
Degree programmes
Political Sciences and Sociology
Teachers
Heikki Huilaja
Teacher in charge
Heikki Huilaja
Groups
YTKENG
SOC/YTK - Courses offered in English
Course
SOPT1213B

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

After completion of the course the student is able to
- specify different sociological debates about work
- explore sociologically how differences such as gender, ethnicity, competence and class are structured in and by work
- use theoretical approaches in analyzing societal meanings of work.

Execution methods

Independent study of literature.

Accomplishment methods

The course is completed by reading the literature and taking a book exam (on EXAM).

Content

This course focuses on societal functions, relations and structures from the perspective of work-studies. Work itself is a societal order which includes and also shapes the possibilities of participation. During the course the student will get acquainted with different sociological debates about work, working life and changes in work.

Materials

Chris Warhurst, Irena Grugulis & Ewart Keep (eds) (2004) The Skills That Matter. Critical Perspective on Work and Organisations.
Linda WcDowell (2009) Working Bodies: Interactive Service Employment and Workplace Identities.

Completion alternatives

Tentti tai essee

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Fail: Performance is highly deficient or erroneous. The work may be based on serious misunderstandings.

Sufficient and satisfactory (1-2): Performance is lacking in scope, superficial, or corresponds poorly to the assignment. The author merely lists things out of context or addresses them one-sidedly. The work may contain errors or obscurities.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Good and very good (3-4): Performance corresponds to the assignment, manifesting comprehension and a skill to analyse and justify. The author has addressed the issue comprehensively. The work may contain some deficiencies.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent (5): Performance delineates an extensive whole and the author can apply knowledge in a multifaceted way or place it in various contexts. The work manifests independency and insight, and it is a flawless entity that involves justified thinking or critical contemplation. The work is well written and implemented.

Go back to top of page