Skip to main content

Art Methods in Social Services (5 cr)

Code: K700BE02-3001

General information


Enrollment

14.03.2022 - 06.09.2022

Timing

13.09.2022 - 23.10.2022

Credits

5 op

Virtual proportion (cr)

5 op

Mode of delivery

Distance learning

Unit

Bachelor of Social Services

Office

Kosmos, Tietokatu 1, Kemi

Teaching languages

  • Finnish

Seats

0 - 45

Degree programmes

  • Bachelor of Social Services

Teachers

  • Sari Leppälä
  • Virpi Piira

Responsible person

Sanna Viinonen

Student groups

  • KA71S22K
    Sosionomikoulutus,Kemi kevät 2022

Objective

Learning objectives:

The student
- deepens their self-knowledge and creativity
- can use art methods in self-expression and in groups
- is encouraged to try art methods in social services work

Content

Contents:
- The construction of self-knowledge through the individual, communal and cultural environment
- Select art methods that activate and support participation in the social services field
- Practising directing a small-scale art project

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Teachers evaluate the written work of the student workshop, which includes the theoretical part and the action plan, approved / rejected.

Evaluation of the written plan:
Approved:
The instructions given have been followed as required. All aspects have been addressed and justified. Art orientation is justified. The transitions have received attention and have been described. The division of roles is highlighted. The goals have been defined. The whole is logical enough. The language is good. Adequate resources have been used. The source references are mostly marked correctly.

Fail: The instructions in the workshop plan have not been followed as required. The instructed elements of the plan are not justified or are confused. The workshop plan is not art-based. Transition situations have not been described and the division of roles is missing or very unclear. Goals are missing. The whole is narrow and fragmented / confusing. The language is weak. Sources not used / sources not suitable. Source references are missing or incorrectly marked.

Criteria for evaluating the implementation of the workshop:
Approved:
The implementation of the workshop is planned and has been built smoothly. The guidance is relatively clear and client inclusive.

Fail: The implementation of the workshop is fragmented and inconsistent. Guidance is weak and lacks planning and instructor contact with participants. There is no theme in the workshop and its purpose remains unclear. There is a lack of art-based work. The workshop is not and does not allow for group collaboration.

The overall assessment of the course: approved / fail

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Pass:

Professional knowledge base and concepts:

The student masters the possibilities of art-based activities and the cultural environment to strengthen the building of individual and community self-knowledge. The student is familiar with various art-based functional and inclusive methods that can be utilized in the social field and early childhood education. The student is able to deepen his or her own self-knowledge through art-based activities and use interesting ways to apply art-based activities as part of client work.

Professional activities:

The student is well acquainted with the design of art-based work (eg a workshop) and deals with the chosen topic in an interesting way. The implementation and supervision of art-based work (eg workshop) is successful.

Ethical competence and responsibility:

The student is able to reflect on the suitability of art-based work and the success of realized art-based work in client work. He / she is able to act in an ethically sustainable and customer-appreciating and appropriate manner.


Fail:

Professional knowledge base and concepts:

The student is not able to describe the possibilities of art-based activities and cultural environment to strengthen the building of individual and community self-knowledge. The student is not familiar with art-based functional and inclusive methods that can be utilized in the social field or early childhood education. The student does not expand his or her own self-knowledge through art-based activities and does not experience an interest in using art-based activities as part of client work.

Professional activities:

The student has not focused on planning art-based work (e.g. workshop). The topic cannot be cropped and the work is inconsistent. The implementation of art-based work is unexpected and the guidance is only momentary. Art-based work does not arouse interest in the participants.

Ethical competence and responsibility:

The student is not able to describe the suitability of art-based work and the success of realized art-based work in client work. He does not act in an ethically sustainable and customer-appreciative and appropriate manner.

Qualifications

NULL