Skip to main content

Theories of International Relations (5 cr)

Code: SOPT1210V24-3002

General information


Enrollment
03.12.2025 - 31.05.2026
Registration for introductions has not started yet. Registration starts :startDate
Timing
01.01.2026 - 31.07.2026
The implementation has not yet started.
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 cr
Local portion
0 cr
Virtual portion
5 cr
Mode of delivery
Distance learning
Unit
Faculty of Social Sciences
Teaching languages
English
Seats
1 - 500
Degree programmes
Political Sciences and Sociology
Teachers
Julian Reid
Teacher in charge
Julian Reid
Groups
YTKENG
SOC/YTK - Courses offered in English
Course
SOPT1210V24

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

After completion of the course the student is able to
- discuss the main theories of the discipline of International Relations (IR)
- identify the main myths of each of the different main theories of IR
- explain the ideological limits and potentials of different theories of IR.

Execution methods

Teaching profile: ONLINE 1.

Accomplishment methods

Participation in all classes including a video presentation (2 op) and a written assignment (3 op).

Content

This course introduces students to the ways that different theories make sense of the nature of international relations. The purpose of the course is to give a thorough overview of these different theories, contextualise them in the historical conditions of their emergence, and explore their ideological limits and political potentials. These theories include: realism; liberalism; constructivism; gender and feminism; Marxism; anarchism; and environmentalism.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Fail (0): Performance is highly deficient or erroneous. The work is based on serious misunderstandings.

Sufficient (1): Performance is lacking in scope, superficial, or corresponds poorly to the assignment. The author merely lists things out of context or addresses them one-sidedly. The work may contain errors or obscurities.

Satisfactory (2): Poor in significant respects, but involving signs of comprehension and thought.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Good (3): Good work. Performance corresponds to the assignment, manifesting comprehension and a skill to analyse and justify. The author has addressed the issue comprehensively. The work may contain some deficiencies.

Very good (4): Very good effort. Above the average, demonstrating potential for excellence.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent (5): Performance delineates an extensive whole and the author can apply knowledge in a multifaceted way or place it in various contexts. The work manifests independence and insight, and it is a flawless entity that involves justified thinking or critical contemplation. The work is well written and implemented.

Qualifications

Introduction to Political Studies and Sociology

Go back to top of page