Arctic Design Project (6cr)

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

After completing the course, the student is able to:
- in terms of project organization, describe the most common practices and forms of cooperation in the field of arts and culture
- draw up a project plan
- define the stages of project work
- specify the contents of the project and financing plan and the project report
- apply the core competence of one's own design field to project planning
- proceed systematically in their project work
- evaluate the progress of the project and develop project activities based on it
- work in a multidisciplinary team of 7 to 12 students from at least three fields of study
- document the stages of the project using different methods
- prepare a project report and present the project visually and verbally

Execution methods

Total work 162 h: Project lectures and presentations (27 h), project supervision, independent work and participation in the final seminar and / or exhibition.

Accomplishment methods

Participation in lectures, lecture-related exercises, project plan, project implementation and project reporting as required. Presentation of the project in the interim and final seminar, as well as in the publication or exhibition as agreed.

Content

Orientation lectures with exercises, working in a multidisciplinary project / production in work tasks in one's own design field. Division of responsibilities in the group for project / production planning, implementation, documentation, evaluation and reporting. Project / Production content areas and targets are selected annually from current themes (5-8 common project topics)

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

0: The performance is very incomplete or incorrect, or contains significant misunderstandings.
1-2: Performance is narrow, superficial, or poorly matched to assignment. The performance is limited to listing things in isolation, or dealing with things unilaterally. Execution may contain errors or ambiguities.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Performance corresponds to assignment, demonstrates understanding and the ability to analyze and justify. The whole picture has been formed, but there may be shortcomings.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The performance outlines a broad entity and the knowledge can be applied multidimensionally or placed in different contexts. Performance demonstrates independent grip and insight. Performance is an intact entity that includes justified self-thinking or critical reflection. The answer is well written or implemented.