History of Scandinavia (3 cr)

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

After the course, the student will:

- can explain the main events in Scandinavian history
- can explain the basics of Scandinavian cultural history
- can distinguish between the main events in the history of the Nordic countries
- can explain the causes and consequences of the main events
- can compare the most important continuities and changes in different periods

Execution methods

Independent, pair or group work by the student 80 h.

Accomplishment methods

Delivery method options:

1. Exam on literature
2. essay
3. reading group (minimum 2 persons, preferably 3 or more)
4. podcast (2-3 people)
5. agreed method

Please contact the teacher responsible to agree on your preferred delivery method.

The World History unit consists of two 4op units.

Content

- The main historical events in Scandinavian countries at different times
- Individual characteristics of countries during historical periods
- The role of the Scandinavian countries in international dialogue

Materials

Seppo Hentilä, Christian Krötzl, Panu Pulma: Pohjoismaiden historia Edita 2002.



Richard Hall: Matka viikinkien maailmaan. Moreeni 2012

Teaching methods

Opiskelijan itsenäinen, pari-, tai ryhmätyöskentely

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Rejected:
The student's performance is very incomplete, incorrect or contains significant misunderstandings. The performance does not meet the objectives of the course and demonstrates significant failure.

1:
The student has completed the assignment, but the performance is concise, superficial, or poorly aligned with the assignment. The performance is content to list issues in isolation or to deal with issues in a one-sided manner. The performance contains errors or ambiguities

2:
The performance corresponds to the mission statement, but it is limited or superficial, with a loose and one-sided listing of issues. The performance may contain errors or ambiguities.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

3:
Performance is in line with the brief and demonstrates the ability to analyse and justify. The student has an overall understanding of the issue, but there may be some gaps or weaknesses in performance.

4:
The student has performed the task very well. Performance is excellent in relation to the assignment and shows strong skills in analysis and reasoning. The student has an overall understanding of the issue and there are few weaknesses in performance.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

5:
Performance is excellent. The student has a broad overview and is able to apply information in a multidimensional way or place it in different contexts. Performance demonstrates an independent approach and insight. The response is well written or executed and forms a coherent whole, including reasoned personal reflection or critical thinking.