Supporting Participation and Self-determination (5 cr)

Evaluation scale

H-5

Content scheduling

Kevät -24, 2. periodi

Objective

Learning objectives:

The student
- can support and promote a person’s participation and self-determination in a situation where they need support and guidance
- knows work methods that support participation and self-determination
- can apply and develop appropriate participatory work methods and models

Content

Contents:
- Participation and self-determination
- Restriction of self-determination and use of restrictive measures
- Personal budgeting and supported decision-making
- Various participatory work methods and models of individual and group guidance

Location and time

Kevät 2024, 2.periodi
Luentoja Zoomissa 10h ja kampuksella 8h (Lapin Ammattikorkeakoulu, Tietokatu 1, Kemi)

Materials

Moodlessa mainittu materiaali ja muu opettajan osoittama materiaali.

Teaching methods

Vuorovaikutuksellista luennointia, tuntitehtäviä, itsenäinen työskentely, pienryhmätyöskentely, mahdollinen asiantuntijavierailija, oppimiskeskustelut

- Osallistuminen luennoille
- Oppimistehtävä; tapahtuu yksin tai pienessä ryhmässä. Arvioidaan 0-5
- 2 Välitehtävää; tehdään pienessä ryhmässä. Arvioidaan hyväksytty/hyvätty.

Tehtävien tarkemmat kuvaukset löytyvät Moodlesta opintojakson alkaessa.

Employer connections

Mahdollinen työelämävierailija

Student workload

Opintojakson laajuus on 5 op, mikä tarkoittaa opiskelijan työnä 135 tuntia.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Fail (0)

Professional knowledge base and concepts:
The student does not know the concepts of inclusion and sovereignty. The student does not know working methods that support inclusion or self-determination.

Professional activities:
The student is not able to support people's inclusion and self-determination in situations where they need support and guidance. The student does not recognize participatory work methods or methods.

Ethical competence and responsibility:
The student is not able to describe the values ​​and ethical principles of the profession. He is not aware of the client's status, rights or involvement in his activities.

Satisfactory (1)

Professional knowledge base and concepts:
The student has a poor knowledge of the concepts of inclusion and self-determination. The student has little knowledge of working methods that support inclusion and self-determination.

Professional activities:
The student is able to support people's inclusion and self-determination to some extent in situations where they need support and guidance. The student will identify some participatory work methods and methods.

Ethical competence and responsibility:
To some extent, the student is able to describe the values ​​and ethical principles of the profession. He is aware of the client's position, rights and involvement in his activities.

Satisfactory (2)

Professional knowledge base and concepts:
The student knows the concepts of inclusion and self-determination to some extent. The student is partially familiar with working methods that support inclusion and self-determination.

Professional activities:
The student is able to support and to some extent promote people's inclusion and self-determination in situations where they need support and guidance. The student identifies participatory work methods and methods.

Ethical competence and responsibility:
To some extent, the student is able to describe the values ​​and ethical principles of the profession. He understands the role, rights and involvement of the client in his activities.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Good (3)

Professional knowledge base and concepts:
The student knows the concepts of inclusion and sovereignty well. The student mainly knows working methods that support inclusion and self-determination.

Professional activities:
The student is able to support and to some extent promote people's inclusion and self-determination in situations where they need support and guidance. The student is able to apply appropriate participatory work methods and methods.

Ethical competence and responsibility:
The student is able to describe the values ​​and ethical principles of the profession quite well. He understands and considers the client's position, rights and involvement in his activities.

Good (4)

Professional knowledge base and concepts:
The student knows the concepts of inclusion and self-determination well. The student knows working methods that support inclusion and self-determination.

Professional activities:
The student is able to support and promote people's inclusion and self-determination in situations where they need support and guidance. The student is able to apply appropriate participatory work methods and methods.

Ethical competence and responsibility:
The student is able to describe the values ​​and ethical principles of the profession well. He understands and considers the client's position, rights and involvement in his activities.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent (5)

Professional knowledge base and concepts:
The student knows the concepts of inclusion and self-determination very well. The student knows working methods that support inclusion and self-determination.

Professional activities:
The student is able to support and promote people's inclusion and self-determination in a variety of situations where they need support and guidance. The student is able to apply appropriate participatory work methods and methods.

Ethical competence and responsibility:
The student is able to describe the values and ethical principles of the profession at an excellent level. He understands and considers the client's position, rights and involvement in his activities.

Qualifications

NULL