Skip to main content

International Relations of the Arctic (5 cr)

Code: SOPT1210-3003

General information


Enrollment
08.08.2023 - 22.11.2023
Registration for the implementation has ended.
Timing
29.11.2023 - 15.12.2023
Implementation has ended.
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 cr
Local portion
5 cr
Mode of delivery
Contact learning
Unit
Faculty of Social Sciences
Teaching languages
English
Seats
1 - 500
Degree programmes
Political Sciences and Sociology
Teachers
Julian Reid
Teacher in charge
Julian Reid
Groups
YTKENG
SOC/YTK - Courses offered in English
Course
SOPT1210

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

After completion of the course the student is able to
- explore the role and importance of the Arctic in international relations
- identify the key political issues and policy problematics associated with the Arctic
- think critically about the limits of existing approaches to the Arctic and its roles in it.

Execution methods

Lectures and seminars (16 hours). Independent work.

Accomplishment methods

Participation in all classes including a seminar presentation (2 op) and a written assignment (3 op).

Content

The course starts by introducing students to the various ways in which the Arctic is conceptualised in international relations. It then examines the ways in which Arctic states seek to govern the Arctic, its peoples and its resources, and the conflicts within and between states which ensue. The Arctic will also be approached as a space of attempted innovation and change in international relations, as the course focuses on the origins and development of the Arctic Council, a still fairly unique experiment in the integration of indigenous peoples in international governance structures.

Materials

To be distributed at the beginning of the course.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Fail: Performance is highly deficient or erroneous. The work may be based on serious misunderstandings.

Sufficient and satisfactory (1-2): Performance is lacking in scope, superficial, or corresponds poorly to the assignment. The author merely lists things out of context or addresses them one-sidedly. The work may contain errors or obscurities.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Good and very good (3-4): Performance corresponds to the assignment, manifesting comprehension and a skill to analyse and justify. The author has addressed the issue comprehensively. The work may contain some deficiencies.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent (5): Performance delineates an extensive whole and the author can apply knowledge in a multifaceted way or place it in various contexts. The work manifests independency and insight, and it is a flawless entity that involves justified thinking or critical contemplation. The work is well written and implemented.

Qualifications

SOPT1101 Introduction to Sociology, SOPT0001 Introduction to Political Science and SOPT0002 Introduction to International Relations

Go back to top of page