Socially-engaged Art (2cr)

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Learning outcome
Having completed the course the student can-outline the operating area of applied visual art-recognize the skills needed by a visual artist in designing and implementing event environments and events-understand the theoretical principles community art activity

Execution methods

Lectures and exercises 24 h, independent work 51 h

Accomplishment methods

Active participation in lectures and exercises. Implementation of tasks and group work

Content

Outlining the differences between visual art, community art, community based art education art, architecture. The course will explore specific strategies and approaches to socially engaged art practices through readings and direct engagement with community-based projects. Application options of visual art in event environments and programme services. Principles of art’s eff on wellbeing

Teaching methods

AMASS-hanke järjestää avoimen tutkimuskonferenssin, jossa tutkijat esittelevät sosiaalisesti sitoutuneeseen taiteeseen liittyvää tutkimusta. Voit osallistua konfressiin, ja omavalintaisesti kuunnella keynote-esitelmiä ja tutkijoiden puheenvuoroja sekä kirjoittaa 4-5 sivun luontopäiväkirjan, joka keskittyy tutkimusmetodinäkökulmaan: "Millaisia tutkimusmetodeja puhujat esittelevät esitelmissään"
Konfrenssiin täytyy osallistujien rekisteröityä. Alla on ensin linkki koko konfressin sivulla, sekä sen alla kaksi eri rekisteröitymislinkkiä, joista ylin koskee taide- ja kulttuuripolitiikan keskustelua, johon voi myös osallistua.

Dialogical arts through sustainable communities:
Acting on the margins, redefining empowerment
16-18 FEBRUARY 2022 | ONLINE | register at www.amassconference.com

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Fail
The performance is very incomplete or incorrect, or contains significant misunderstandings.

Passable and satisfactory (1-2)
Performance is narrow, superficial, or poorly matched to assignment. The performance is limited to listing things in isolation, or dealing with things unilaterally. Execution may contain errors or ambiguities.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Good and commendable (3-4)

Performance corresponds to assignment, demonstrates understanding and the ability to analyze and justify. The whole picture has been formed, but there may be shortcomings.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent (5)

The performance outlines a broad entity and the knowledge can be applied multidimensionally or placed in different contexts. Performance demonstrates independent grip and insight. Performance is an intact entity that includes justified self-thinking or critical reflection. The answer is well written or implemented.