Skip to main content

Project: Finding solutionLaajuus (5 cr)

Code: K502K202OJ

Credits

5 op

Objective

In the project you will continue the Fall semester's case. You work independently as a member of a project team ja bear responsibility from your own work. Project follows the CDIO-model: I (Implementation) = you implement the designed solution and produce necessary documentation. O (operate) = You monitor the functionality of the solution and make improvements if necessary.

Content

..

Qualifications

K502K201 Work life project

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Process evaluation: participation and interaction, participation to work, group work skills, problem solving skills.
Output evaluation: The quality of the work results, quality of the documentation, comparison of results to the task description

Grade 1.
The student participates almost to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks. The student requires a lot of support from the teacher and team in fulfilling the tasks and cannot perform them independently in given timeframe. The results and quality of the results fulfill only the minimum requirements. There is clear errors and formal lacks in the results. The student describes issues on inadequate grounds and there is great lacks in the knowhow. There is great lacks in making and following the project plan.

Grade 2.
The student participates almost to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull partially independent as a part of the team but the student still needs a lot of help from the teacher and team. The results and quality of the results fulfill the minimum requirements. There is some recurrent errors and formal lacks in the results. The student aims to describe issues professionally. Following the project plan is still partially unplanned and the student needs guidance in fulfilling the work requirements.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Process evaluation: participation and interaction, participation to work, group work skills, problem solving skills.
Output evaluation: The quality of the work results, quality of the documentation, comparison of results to the task description

Grade 3.
The student participates to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks in given timeframe. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull partially independent as a part of the team, the work and results are done mainly with good quality. Results are almost flawless and the documentation fulfills the necessary requirements. Following the project plan is under control, given tasks are performed well and returned mainly in given timeframe.

Grade 4.
The student participates to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks in given timeframe. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull almost totally independent as a part of the team, the work and results are done with good quality. The student clearly handles the topics well and can present issues according to given instructions and rules. The student can plan his/her own work based on the project plan and progress independently. Timetable is under control, tasks are done and returned within given timeframe.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Process evaluation: participation and interaction, participation to work, group work skills, problem solving skills.
Output evaluation: The quality of the work results, quality of the documentation, comparison of results to the task description

Grade 5.
The student participates to every action defined in the project and passes clearly all the required mandatory tasks in given timeframe. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull totally independent as a part of the team. The work and results are done with high quality and the student is able to produce new knowledge and solutions. The results are done with excellent quality. The student handles the issues of the project very well and is able to make conclusions well and adopt them in new context, also with demanding problems. Following the timetable is well under control, tasks are done and returned within given timeframe.

Enrollment

01.10.2024 - 05.01.2025

Timing

01.01.2025 - 31.05.2025

Credits

5 op

Mode of delivery

Contact teaching

Unit

Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Seats

0 - 60

Degree programmes
  • Degree Programme in Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
  • Päivi Honka
  • Raimo Ruoppa
  • Petri Kesälahti
  • Arto Jäntti
  • Juha-Matti Raappana
  • Reetta Mustonen
  • Timo Kauppi
Responsible person

Timo Kauppi

Student groups
  • K52K22S
  • KA52K22Sr1
  • KA52K22S
    Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering (blended studies), Kemi, syksy 2022
  • KA52K22Sr2
  • KA52K22Sr3
    Insinöörikoulutus, konetekniikka (monimuotototeutus), Kemi, syksy 2022

Objective

In the project you will continue the Fall semester's case. You work independently as a member of a project team ja bear responsibility from your own work. Project follows the CDIO-model: I (Implementation) = you implement the designed solution and produce necessary documentation. O (operate) = You monitor the functionality of the solution and make improvements if necessary.

Content

..

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Process evaluation: participation and interaction, participation to work, group work skills, problem solving skills.
Output evaluation: The quality of the work results, quality of the documentation, comparison of results to the task description

Grade 1.
The student participates almost to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks. The student requires a lot of support from the teacher and team in fulfilling the tasks and cannot perform them independently in given timeframe. The results and quality of the results fulfill only the minimum requirements. There is clear errors and formal lacks in the results. The student describes issues on inadequate grounds and there is great lacks in the knowhow. There is great lacks in making and following the project plan.

Grade 2.
The student participates almost to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull partially independent as a part of the team but the student still needs a lot of help from the teacher and team. The results and quality of the results fulfill the minimum requirements. There is some recurrent errors and formal lacks in the results. The student aims to describe issues professionally. Following the project plan is still partially unplanned and the student needs guidance in fulfilling the work requirements.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Process evaluation: participation and interaction, participation to work, group work skills, problem solving skills.
Output evaluation: The quality of the work results, quality of the documentation, comparison of results to the task description

Grade 3.
The student participates to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks in given timeframe. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull partially independent as a part of the team, the work and results are done mainly with good quality. Results are almost flawless and the documentation fulfills the necessary requirements. Following the project plan is under control, given tasks are performed well and returned mainly in given timeframe.

Grade 4.
The student participates to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks in given timeframe. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull almost totally independent as a part of the team, the work and results are done with good quality. The student clearly handles the topics well and can present issues according to given instructions and rules. The student can plan his/her own work based on the project plan and progress independently. Timetable is under control, tasks are done and returned within given timeframe.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Process evaluation: participation and interaction, participation to work, group work skills, problem solving skills.
Output evaluation: The quality of the work results, quality of the documentation, comparison of results to the task description

Grade 5.
The student participates to every action defined in the project and passes clearly all the required mandatory tasks in given timeframe. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull totally independent as a part of the team. The work and results are done with high quality and the student is able to produce new knowledge and solutions. The results are done with excellent quality. The student handles the issues of the project very well and is able to make conclusions well and adopt them in new context, also with demanding problems. Following the timetable is well under control, tasks are done and returned within given timeframe.

Qualifications

K502K201 Work life project

Enrollment

02.10.2023 - 31.12.2023

Timing

01.01.2024 - 31.05.2024

Credits

5 op

Mode of delivery

Contact teaching

Unit

Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Seats

0 - 60

Degree programmes
  • Degree Programme in Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
  • Reetta Mustonen
  • Johanna Aarnio-Keinänen
  • Konetekniikan koulutus AMK
  • Päivi Honka
  • Katri Hendriksson
  • Timo Kauppi
  • Ville Kanto
Responsible person

Timo Kauppi

Student groups
  • KA52K21Sr2
  • KA52K21Sr1
  • KA52K21Sr3
  • KA52K21S
    Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering (blended studies), Kemi, syksy 2021

Objective

In the project you will continue the Fall semester's case. You work independently as a member of a project team ja bear responsibility from your own work. Project follows the CDIO-model: I (Implementation) = you implement the designed solution and produce necessary documentation. O (operate) = You monitor the functionality of the solution and make improvements if necessary.

Content

..

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Process evaluation: participation and interaction, participation to work, group work skills, problem solving skills.
Output evaluation: The quality of the work results, quality of the documentation, comparison of results to the task description

Grade 1.
The student participates almost to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks. The student requires a lot of support from the teacher and team in fulfilling the tasks and cannot perform them independently in given timeframe. The results and quality of the results fulfill only the minimum requirements. There is clear errors and formal lacks in the results. The student describes issues on inadequate grounds and there is great lacks in the knowhow. There is great lacks in making and following the project plan.

Grade 2.
The student participates almost to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull partially independent as a part of the team but the student still needs a lot of help from the teacher and team. The results and quality of the results fulfill the minimum requirements. There is some recurrent errors and formal lacks in the results. The student aims to describe issues professionally. Following the project plan is still partially unplanned and the student needs guidance in fulfilling the work requirements.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Process evaluation: participation and interaction, participation to work, group work skills, problem solving skills.
Output evaluation: The quality of the work results, quality of the documentation, comparison of results to the task description

Grade 3.
The student participates to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks in given timeframe. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull partially independent as a part of the team, the work and results are done mainly with good quality. Results are almost flawless and the documentation fulfills the necessary requirements. Following the project plan is under control, given tasks are performed well and returned mainly in given timeframe.

Grade 4.
The student participates to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks in given timeframe. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull almost totally independent as a part of the team, the work and results are done with good quality. The student clearly handles the topics well and can present issues according to given instructions and rules. The student can plan his/her own work based on the project plan and progress independently. Timetable is under control, tasks are done and returned within given timeframe.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Process evaluation: participation and interaction, participation to work, group work skills, problem solving skills.
Output evaluation: The quality of the work results, quality of the documentation, comparison of results to the task description

Grade 5.
The student participates to every action defined in the project and passes clearly all the required mandatory tasks in given timeframe. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull totally independent as a part of the team. The work and results are done with high quality and the student is able to produce new knowledge and solutions. The results are done with excellent quality. The student handles the issues of the project very well and is able to make conclusions well and adopt them in new context, also with demanding problems. Following the timetable is well under control, tasks are done and returned within given timeframe.

Qualifications

K502K201 Work life project

Enrollment

03.10.2022 - 31.12.2022

Timing

01.01.2023 - 31.05.2023

Credits

5 op

Mode of delivery

Contact teaching

Unit

Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Seats

0 - 45

Degree programmes
  • Degree Programme in Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
  • Jukka Joutsenvaara
  • Päivi Honka
  • Katri Hendriksson
  • Raimo Vierelä
  • Timo Kauppi
Responsible person

Timo Kauppi

Student groups
  • KA52K20S
  • KA52K20Sr3
  • KA52K20Sr2
  • KA52K20Sr1

Objective

In the project you will continue the Fall semester's case. You work independently as a member of a project team ja bear responsibility from your own work. Project follows the CDIO-model: I (Implementation) = you implement the designed solution and produce necessary documentation. O (operate) = You monitor the functionality of the solution and make improvements if necessary.

Content

..

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Process evaluation: participation and interaction, participation to work, group work skills, problem solving skills.
Output evaluation: The quality of the work results, quality of the documentation, comparison of results to the task description

Grade 1.
The student participates almost to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks. The student requires a lot of support from the teacher and team in fulfilling the tasks and cannot perform them independently in given timeframe. The results and quality of the results fulfill only the minimum requirements. There is clear errors and formal lacks in the results. The student describes issues on inadequate grounds and there is great lacks in the knowhow. There is great lacks in making and following the project plan.

Grade 2.
The student participates almost to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull partially independent as a part of the team but the student still needs a lot of help from the teacher and team. The results and quality of the results fulfill the minimum requirements. There is some recurrent errors and formal lacks in the results. The student aims to describe issues professionally. Following the project plan is still partially unplanned and the student needs guidance in fulfilling the work requirements.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Process evaluation: participation and interaction, participation to work, group work skills, problem solving skills.
Output evaluation: The quality of the work results, quality of the documentation, comparison of results to the task description

Grade 3.
The student participates to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks in given timeframe. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull partially independent as a part of the team, the work and results are done mainly with good quality. Results are almost flawless and the documentation fulfills the necessary requirements. Following the project plan is under control, given tasks are performed well and returned mainly in given timeframe.

Grade 4.
The student participates to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks in given timeframe. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull almost totally independent as a part of the team, the work and results are done with good quality. The student clearly handles the topics well and can present issues according to given instructions and rules. The student can plan his/her own work based on the project plan and progress independently. Timetable is under control, tasks are done and returned within given timeframe.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Process evaluation: participation and interaction, participation to work, group work skills, problem solving skills.
Output evaluation: The quality of the work results, quality of the documentation, comparison of results to the task description

Grade 5.
The student participates to every action defined in the project and passes clearly all the required mandatory tasks in given timeframe. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull totally independent as a part of the team. The work and results are done with high quality and the student is able to produce new knowledge and solutions. The results are done with excellent quality. The student handles the issues of the project very well and is able to make conclusions well and adopt them in new context, also with demanding problems. Following the timetable is well under control, tasks are done and returned within given timeframe.

Qualifications

K502K201 Work life project

Enrollment

01.10.2021 - 07.01.2022

Timing

01.01.2022 - 31.05.2022

Credits

5 op

Mode of delivery

Contact teaching

Unit

Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Degree Programme in Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
  • Konetekniikan koulutus AMK
  • Päivi Honka
  • Timo Kauppi
  • Ari Pikkarainen
Responsible person

Ari Pikkarainen

Student groups
  • K52K19S

Objective

In the project you will continue the Fall semester's case. You work independently as a member of a project team ja bear responsibility from your own work. Project follows the CDIO-model: I (Implementation) = you implement the designed solution and produce necessary documentation. O (operate) = You monitor the functionality of the solution and make improvements if necessary.

Content

..

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Process evaluation: participation and interaction, participation to work, group work skills, problem solving skills.
Output evaluation: The quality of the work results, quality of the documentation, comparison of results to the task description

Grade 1.
The student participates almost to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks. The student requires a lot of support from the teacher and team in fulfilling the tasks and cannot perform them independently in given timeframe. The results and quality of the results fulfill only the minimum requirements. There is clear errors and formal lacks in the results. The student describes issues on inadequate grounds and there is great lacks in the knowhow. There is great lacks in making and following the project plan.

Grade 2.
The student participates almost to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull partially independent as a part of the team but the student still needs a lot of help from the teacher and team. The results and quality of the results fulfill the minimum requirements. There is some recurrent errors and formal lacks in the results. The student aims to describe issues professionally. Following the project plan is still partially unplanned and the student needs guidance in fulfilling the work requirements.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Process evaluation: participation and interaction, participation to work, group work skills, problem solving skills.
Output evaluation: The quality of the work results, quality of the documentation, comparison of results to the task description

Grade 3.
The student participates to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks in given timeframe. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull partially independent as a part of the team, the work and results are done mainly with good quality. Results are almost flawless and the documentation fulfills the necessary requirements. Following the project plan is under control, given tasks are performed well and returned mainly in given timeframe.

Grade 4.
The student participates to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks in given timeframe. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull almost totally independent as a part of the team, the work and results are done with good quality. The student clearly handles the topics well and can present issues according to given instructions and rules. The student can plan his/her own work based on the project plan and progress independently. Timetable is under control, tasks are done and returned within given timeframe.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Process evaluation: participation and interaction, participation to work, group work skills, problem solving skills.
Output evaluation: The quality of the work results, quality of the documentation, comparison of results to the task description

Grade 5.
The student participates to every action defined in the project and passes clearly all the required mandatory tasks in given timeframe. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull totally independent as a part of the team. The work and results are done with high quality and the student is able to produce new knowledge and solutions. The results are done with excellent quality. The student handles the issues of the project very well and is able to make conclusions well and adopt them in new context, also with demanding problems. Following the timetable is well under control, tasks are done and returned within given timeframe.

Assessment methods and criteria

Process evaluation: Participation to project work, reviews and staying in schedule
Throughput evaluation: Document quality (project documents, drawings, instructions, technical documents etc.) , comparison of results to the task description

Qualifications

K502K201 Work life project

Enrollment

01.10.2021 - 07.01.2022

Timing

01.01.2022 - 31.05.2022

Credits

5 op

Virtual proportion (cr)

4 op

Mode of delivery

20 % Contact teaching, 80 % Distance learning

Unit

Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Seats

0 - 50

Degree programmes
  • Degree Programme in Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
  • Konetekniikan koulutus AMK
  • Päivi Honka
  • Timo Kauppi
  • Katri Hendriksson
  • Ari Pikkarainen
Responsible person

Timo Kauppi

Student groups
  • KA52K19S

Objective

In the project you will continue the Fall semester's case. You work independently as a member of a project team ja bear responsibility from your own work. Project follows the CDIO-model: I (Implementation) = you implement the designed solution and produce necessary documentation. O (operate) = You monitor the functionality of the solution and make improvements if necessary.

Content

..

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Process evaluation: participation and interaction, participation to work, group work skills, problem solving skills.
Output evaluation: The quality of the work results, quality of the documentation, comparison of results to the task description

Grade 1.
The student participates almost to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks. The student requires a lot of support from the teacher and team in fulfilling the tasks and cannot perform them independently in given timeframe. The results and quality of the results fulfill only the minimum requirements. There is clear errors and formal lacks in the results. The student describes issues on inadequate grounds and there is great lacks in the knowhow. There is great lacks in making and following the project plan.

Grade 2.
The student participates almost to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull partially independent as a part of the team but the student still needs a lot of help from the teacher and team. The results and quality of the results fulfill the minimum requirements. There is some recurrent errors and formal lacks in the results. The student aims to describe issues professionally. Following the project plan is still partially unplanned and the student needs guidance in fulfilling the work requirements.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Process evaluation: participation and interaction, participation to work, group work skills, problem solving skills.
Output evaluation: The quality of the work results, quality of the documentation, comparison of results to the task description

Grade 3.
The student participates to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks in given timeframe. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull partially independent as a part of the team, the work and results are done mainly with good quality. Results are almost flawless and the documentation fulfills the necessary requirements. Following the project plan is under control, given tasks are performed well and returned mainly in given timeframe.

Grade 4.
The student participates to every action defined in the project and passes all the required mandatory tasks in given timeframe. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull almost totally independent as a part of the team, the work and results are done with good quality. The student clearly handles the topics well and can present issues according to given instructions and rules. The student can plan his/her own work based on the project plan and progress independently. Timetable is under control, tasks are done and returned within given timeframe.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Process evaluation: participation and interaction, participation to work, group work skills, problem solving skills.
Output evaluation: The quality of the work results, quality of the documentation, comparison of results to the task description

Grade 5.
The student participates to every action defined in the project and passes clearly all the required mandatory tasks in given timeframe. Fulfilling the tasks is successfull totally independent as a part of the team. The work and results are done with high quality and the student is able to produce new knowledge and solutions. The results are done with excellent quality. The student handles the issues of the project very well and is able to make conclusions well and adopt them in new context, also with demanding problems. Following the timetable is well under control, tasks are done and returned within given timeframe.

Assessment methods and criteria

Process evaluation: Participation to project work, reviews and staying in schedule
Throughput evaluation: Document quality (project documents, drawings, instructions, technical documents etc.) , comparison of results to the task description

Qualifications

K502K201 Work life project