Sociology of Social Change (5 cr)
Code: SOPT1213CV24-3002
General information
- Enrollment
- 12.08.2025 - 31.07.2026
- Registration for introductions has not started yet. Registration starts :startDate
- Timing
- 01.08.2025 - 31.07.2026
- The implementation has not yet started.
- Number of ECTS credits allocated
- 5 cr
- Local portion
- 0 cr
- Virtual portion
- 5 cr
- Mode of delivery
- Distance learning
- Unit
- Faculty of Social Sciences
- Teaching languages
- Finnish
- Seats
- 1 - 500
- Degree programmes
- Political Sciences and Sociology
- Teachers
- Leena Suopajärvi
- Teacher in charge
- Leena Suopajärvi
- Groups
-
YTKENGSOC/YTK - Courses offered in English
- Course
- SOPT1213CV24
Evaluation scale
H-5
Objective
After completion of the course the student is able to
- identify the sociological perspectives in the debates about social change
- specify social change on different levels
- evaluate and proportion social changes and debates about social change with broad historical developments.
Execution methods
Teaching profile: ONLINE 2.
Accomplishment methods
The course is completed by reading the literature and taking a book exam (on EXAM).
Content
Sociology initially rose from the need to understand occurring changes in society. Today social change still is at the center of sociology. On this course the student will get acquainted with the sociological perspective to societal changes on different levels by examining different themes and approaches. The basic premise on the course is that changes in society can not be grasped as simple transitions from one societal formation to another, but changes must be understood as stratified, fragmented, discontinuous and asynchronous processes.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Fail (0): Performance is highly deficient or erroneous. The work may be based on serious misunderstandings.
Sufficient (1): Performance is lacking in scope, superficial, or corresponds poorly to the assignment. The author merely lists things out of context.
Satisfactory (2): The performance mainly repeats the content of the course or addresses them one-sidedly. The work may contain errors or obscurities.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3): Performance corresponds to the assignment, manifesting skills to analyse and justify the content of the course. The work may contain some deficiencies.
Very good (4): The author has addressed the issue comprehensively. Performance manifest comprehension and skills to critically analyse and argue the content of the course.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): Performance delineates an extensive whole and the author can apply knowledge in a multifaceted way or place it in various contexts. The work manifests independency and insight, and it is a flawless entity that involves justified thinking or critical contemplation. The work is well written and implemented.