Human Capital in Tourism (5 cr)
Code: TCIM0404-3001
General information
- Enrollment
- 02.12.2019 - 31.12.2019
- Registration for the implementation has ended.
- Timing
- 30.01.2020 - 20.02.2020
- Implementation has ended.
- Number of ECTS credits allocated
- 5 cr
- Local portion
- 5 cr
- Mode of delivery
- Contact learning
- Teaching languages
- English
- Course
- TCIM0404
Evaluation scale
H-5
Objective
The course aims to examine individuals within the tourism organization, discussing the topics of values, personality, moods, emotions and attitudes. Drawing upon a psychological perspective, it further analyses concepts such as competency, job satisfaction, motivation and performance. The course also aims to explore the role of teamwork, group dynamics, decision-making, negotiation and conflict resolution within a tourism organizational context. Finally, it gives an overview of policies and practical tools for managing human resources and organizational change.
After completion of the course the student is able to
- evaluate and plan human resource management policies
- analyze and anticipate organizational changes
- motivate and manage employees through participative management practices
- identify workplace conflicts and develop ways of action to solve them.
Execution methods
Lectures and discussions in class (24 h). Independent work.
Accomplishment methods
Active participation.
Essay writing during the course.
Final paper after the course.
Content
Human resource management, organizational behaviour, participative management, employee relations, conflict management, performance management, organizational change.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Fail: Performance is highly deficient or erroneous. The work may be based on serious misunderstandings.
Sufficient and satisfactory (1-2): Performance is lacking in scope, superficial, or corresponds poorly to the assignment. The author merely lists things out of context or addresses them one-sidedly. The work may contain errors or obscurities.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good and very good (3-4): Performance corresponds to the assignment, manifesting comprehension and skill to analyse and justify. The author has addressed the issue comprehensively. The work may contain some deficiencies.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): Performance delineates an extensive whole and the author can apply knowledge in a multifaceted way or place it in various contexts. The work manifests independency and insight, and it is a flawless entity that involves justified thinking or critical contemplation. The work is well written and implemented.