Study Guide

Objective

Developing Online and Off-line Experiences
Developing Experiences (project)
The objective of the study unit is to give the student knowledge on how to design experiences in collaboration with a multi-stakeholder network of an event. He/she will apply service and experience design methods as well as co-creation methodology and live-event simulation in an innovative way.

Content

Tieto puuttuu

Location and time

15.1.-12.4.2024
Online weeks 3-11
Intensive week 12 on campus

Materials

Will be given when the study unit starts

Teaching methods

The study unit is in cooperation with international universities. Theory lessons and project work will be done both online and on site.
Intensive week 12 in Rovaniemi (mandatory)

Employer connections

Collaboration with industry

International connections

International cooperation through Blended Intensive Program (EU funding)

Further information

Make sure you are able to participate in group work remotely or on campus
Make sure you are able to be in Rovaniemi during week 12

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Please note that there might be more specific assessment criteria for learning assignments which will be given at the beginning of the study unit.

Fail (0)
The student does not complete the assignments according to instructions or does not attend the learning situations at all. He/she does not pass the assignments, tests and/or the exam as required.

Poor (1)
The student has a satisfactory command of the theoretical content of the study unit and is able to apply it only partly or not at all in practical learning exercises. He/she seldom participates in the study process and shows very little or no analytical, reflective and critical approach in his/her activities. The assignments are not fully performed according to the instructions.

Satisfactory (2)
The student has a satisfactory command of the theoretical content of the study unit and is able to apply it only partly or not at all in practical learning exercises. He/she seldom participates in the study process and shows very little or no analytical, reflective and critical approach in his/her activities. The assignments are not fully performed according to the instructions.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Good (3)
The student has a rather good command of the theoretical content of the study unit and is able to apply it somehow in practical learning exercises. He/she participates in the study process quite actively and shows somewhat analytical, reflective and critical approach in most of his/her activities. The assignments are performed mostly according to the instructions.

Very good (4)
The student has a good command of the theoretical content of the study unit and is able to apply it mostly in practical learning exercises. He/she participates in the study process quite actively and shows somewhat analytical, reflective and critical approach in most of his/her activities. All the assignments are performed mostly according to the instructions.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent (5)

The student has an excellent command of the theoretical content of the study unit and is able to apply it fully in practical learning exercises. He/she participates in the study process actively and shows analytical, reflective and critical approach in all his/her activities. All the assignments are performed according to the instructions.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Fail (0)
The student does not complete the assignments according to instructions or does not attend the learning situations at all. He/she does not pass the assignments, tests and/or the exam as required.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Poor (1)
The student has a satisfactory command of the theoretical content of the study unit and is able to apply it only partly or not at all in practical learning exercises. He/she seldom participates in the study process and shows very little or no analytical, reflective and critical approach in his/her activities. The assignments are not fully performed according to the instructions.

Satisfactory (2)
The student has a satisfactory command of the theoretical content of the study unit and is able to apply it only partly or not at all in practical learning exercises. He/she seldom participates in the study process and shows very little or no analytical, reflective and critical approach in his/her activities. The assignments are not fully performed according to the instructions.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good (3)
The student has a rather good command of the theoretical content of the study unit and is able to apply it somehow in practical learning exercises. He/she participates in the study process quite actively and shows somewhat analytical, reflective and critical approach in most of his/her activities. The assignments are performed mostly according to the instructions.

Very good (4)
The student has a good command of the theoretical content of the study unit and is able to apply it mostly in practical learning exercises. He/she participates in the study process quite actively and shows somewhat analytical, reflective and critical approach in most of his/her activities. All the assignments are performed mostly according to the instructions.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent (5)

The student has an excellent command of the theoretical content of the study unit and is able to apply it fully in practical learning exercises. He/she participates in the study process actively and shows analytical, reflective and critical approach in all his/her activities. All the assignments are performed according to the instructions.

Qualifications

NULL

Objective

Developing Online and Off-line Experiences
Developing Experiences (project)
The objective of the study unit is to give the student knowledge on how to design experiences in collaboration with a multi-stakeholder network of an event. He/she will apply service and experience design methods as well as co-creation methodology and live-event simulation in an innovative way.

Content

Tieto puuttuu

Location and time

12.1.-30.4.2023
Open Moodle
On campus

Teaching methods

Theory lectures
Workshops
Project Work

Employer connections

Project Work with Arctic Design Week

International connections

In collaboration with two international universities

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Please note that there might be more specific assessment criteria for learning assignments which will be given at the beginning of the study unit.

Fail (0)
The student does not complete the assignments according to instructions or does not attend the learning situations at all. He/she does not pass the assignments, tests and/or the exam as required.

Poor (1)
The student has a satisfactory command of the theoretical content of the study unit and is able to apply it only partly or not at all in practical learning exercises. He/she seldom participates in the study process and shows very little or no analytical, reflective and critical approach in his/her activities. The assignments are not fully performed according to the instructions.

Satisfactory (2)
The student has a satisfactory command of the theoretical content of the study unit and is able to apply it only partly or not at all in practical learning exercises. He/she seldom participates in the study process and shows very little or no analytical, reflective and critical approach in his/her activities. The assignments are not fully performed according to the instructions.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Good (3)
The student has a rather good command of the theoretical content of the study unit and is able to apply it somehow in practical learning exercises. He/she participates in the study process quite actively and shows somewhat analytical, reflective and critical approach in most of his/her activities. The assignments are performed mostly according to the instructions.

Very good (4)
The student has a good command of the theoretical content of the study unit and is able to apply it mostly in practical learning exercises. He/she participates in the study process quite actively and shows somewhat analytical, reflective and critical approach in most of his/her activities. All the assignments are performed mostly according to the instructions.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent (5)

The student has an excellent command of the theoretical content of the study unit and is able to apply it fully in practical learning exercises. He/she participates in the study process actively and shows analytical, reflective and critical approach in all his/her activities. All the assignments are performed according to the instructions.

Assessment methods and criteria

Evaluation is from 1-5 or fail

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student does not complete the assignments according to instructions or does not attend
the learning situations at all. He/she does not pass the assignments.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

poor (1) The student has a satisfactory command of the theoretical content of the study unit and is able
to apply it only partly or not at all in practical learning exercises. He/she seldom participates
in the study process and shows very little or no analytical, reflective and critical approach in
his/her activities. The assignments are not fully performed according to the instructions.

satisfactory (2) The student has a satisfactory command of the theoretical content of the study unit and is able
to apply it only partly or not at all in practical learning exercises. He/she seldom participates
in the study process and shows very little or no analytical, reflective and critical approach in
his/her activities. The assignments are not fully performed according to the instructions.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good (3) The student has a rather good command of the theoretical content of the study unit and is able
to apply it somehow in practical learning exercises. He/she participates in the study process
quite actively and shows somewhat analytical, reflective and critical approach in most of
his/her activities. The assignments are performed mostly according to the instructions.

Very good (4) The student has a good command of the theoretical content of the study unit and is able to
apply it mostly in practical learning exercises. He/she participates in the study process quite
actively and shows somewhat analytical, reflective and critical approach in most of his/her
activities. All the assignments are performed mostly according to the instructions.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent (5) The student has an excellent command of the theoretical content of the study unit and is able
to apply it fully in practical learning exercises. He/she participates in the study process
actively and shows innovative, analytical, reflective and critical approach in all his/her activities. All the
assignments are performed according to the instructions.

Qualifications

NULL

Objective

Developing Online and Off-line Experiences
Developing Experiences (project)
The objective of the study unit is to give the student knowledge on how to design experiences in collaboration with a multi-stakeholder network of an event. He/she will apply service and experience design methods as well as co-creation methodology and live-event simulation in an innovative way.

Content

Tieto puuttuu

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Please note that there might be more specific assessment criteria for learning assignments which will be given at the beginning of the study unit.

Fail (0)
The student does not complete the assignments according to instructions or does not attend the learning situations at all. He/she does not pass the assignments, tests and/or the exam as required.

Poor (1)
The student has a satisfactory command of the theoretical content of the study unit and is able to apply it only partly or not at all in practical learning exercises. He/she seldom participates in the study process and shows very little or no analytical, reflective and critical approach in his/her activities. The assignments are not fully performed according to the instructions.

Satisfactory (2)
The student has a satisfactory command of the theoretical content of the study unit and is able to apply it only partly or not at all in practical learning exercises. He/she seldom participates in the study process and shows very little or no analytical, reflective and critical approach in his/her activities. The assignments are not fully performed according to the instructions.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Good (3)
The student has a rather good command of the theoretical content of the study unit and is able to apply it somehow in practical learning exercises. He/she participates in the study process quite actively and shows somewhat analytical, reflective and critical approach in most of his/her activities. The assignments are performed mostly according to the instructions.

Very good (4)
The student has a good command of the theoretical content of the study unit and is able to apply it mostly in practical learning exercises. He/she participates in the study process quite actively and shows somewhat analytical, reflective and critical approach in most of his/her activities. All the assignments are performed mostly according to the instructions.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent (5)

The student has an excellent command of the theoretical content of the study unit and is able to apply it fully in practical learning exercises. He/she participates in the study process actively and shows analytical, reflective and critical approach in all his/her activities. All the assignments are performed according to the instructions.

Qualifications

NULL